Skip to content

Retirement withdrawal calculator and formula

Take $3,000 a month from a $500,000 pot returning 5 percent a year and the money lasts 23 years and 10 months. After 20 years there is still $123,219.14 in it. At a 3 percent return the same plan is empty in 18 years. A withdrawal rate is a planning rule, not a promise.

Money runs out after

23 years, 10 months

Taking $3,000.00 a month from a $500,000.00 pot returning 5 percent a year. The last withdrawal is a short one.

Withdrawal rate at the start
7.20%
Taken out over 20 years
$720,000.00
Growth over 20 years
$343,219.14
Balance after 20 years
$123,219.14
$
%

A nominal annual rate, divided by twelve here. A compound annual return already has the monthly compounding inside it, so it goes in a little lower than the headline figure.

$

Flat in cash terms. Raising it each year for inflation empties the pot sooner.

yr

The formula

Bn=P(1+i)nW×(1+i)n1iB_n = P(1 + i)^n - W \times \frac{(1 + i)^n - 1}{i}

BnB_n is what is left after nn withdrawals, PP the pot you start with, WW the amount you take each period, and ii the return for one period, which is the nominal annual return divided by 12 when you withdraw monthly, not an effective annual rate.

What this calculator works out

Enter the pot you start with, the return you expect it to earn, and the amount you take out every month. It returns the month the money runs out, the balance left at a horizon you choose, and the growth the pot earned across that same horizon while you were spending from it.

That growth line is not a slice of the balance sitting beside it. In the first example below the pot ends on $123,219.14 having earned $343,219.14, because everything it earned left again as withdrawals, and part of the original pot went with it. The lines add rather than nest: what you started with, plus the growth, less what you took out, leaves the balance.

Two things happen to the pot at once and they pull in opposite directions. The balance earns a return, which pushes it up, and the withdrawal comes out, which pushes it down. Whichever is larger decides the direction, and once the withdrawal is the larger of the two that direction never reverses: the balance falls, the return earned on a smaller balance falls with it, and the gap between them widens every month. That is why a pot being drawn down empties slowly at first and then all at once.

The final withdrawal is almost always a short one, because the balance rarely lands exactly on zero at the end of a month. This page reports the month in which the pot cannot pay a full withdrawal, which is the month the money is gone.

The formula for a pot being drawn down

Each period does two things in order: the balance earns its return, then the withdrawal leaves. Repeat that nn times and what remains is:

Bn=P(1+i)nW×(1+i)n1iB_n = P(1 + i)^n - W \times \frac{(1 + i)^n - 1}{i}

The first term is the pot you started with, left alone. The second is what your withdrawals would have grown into had they stayed invested. The pot runs out at the moment the second term catches the first, which is later than most people guess: compound interest keeps working on whatever is still there, so as long as the pot earns anything at all it lasts longer than the balance divided by the withdrawal.

Set BnB_n to zero and solve for the number of periods:

n=ln(WWiP)ln(1+i)n = \frac{\ln\left(\frac{W}{W - iP}\right)}{\ln(1 + i)}

That bracket only means anything while WW is larger than iPiP, which is the return the pot earns in a single period. Take exactly iPiP and the balance holds level forever. Take less and it climbs. In both cases there is no answer to give, because there is no such month. In the first example below the pot earns 5 percent a year while the withdrawals take out 7.2 percent of the starting balance, so the balance falls.

One convention sits inside that division. Dividing the annual figure by 12 treats it as a nominal annual rate, so twelve months of 0.4167 percent compound to 5.12 percent across the year rather than 5 percent, and 3 percent divided by 12 compounds to 3.04 percent. Enter a figure already quoted as a nominal annual rate and the arithmetic matches the quote exactly. Enter a compound annual return of 5 percent as 5 and the page runs a little generous, because the monthly rate that truly compounds to 5 percent is 0.4074 percent, which empties the same pot at month 280 instead of month 286. The APR against APY calculator converts between the two.

The average return is not the whole answer

This page applies the same return every single month. Markets do not, and a pot being drawn down is unusually sensitive to that difference.

The reason is order. A withdrawal made after a fall sells a larger share of the pot than the same withdrawal made after a rise, and the shares sold are not there for the recovery. Two return sequences with an identical average, run against the same pot and the same withdrawal, do not end in the same place. A drawdown in the first years of a plan therefore costs more than the same drawdown in the last years, which is not true of a pot nobody is spending from.

That is what a fixed withdrawal rate is: a planning rule built on assumptions about returns, about how long the money has to last, and about what the pot holds. It is not a guarantee, and no rate is safe in every sequence of returns that could actually turn up. Use the numbers here to see the shape of a plan and how far it moves when one input changes. This is educational material rather than financial advice.

The trade-off you are actually choosing

Every extra dollar a month is income you get now, paid for out of the far end of the plan. Every dollar you hold back is income you forgo now in exchange for room to absorb a poor decade. There is no setting that gives you both, and that trade is the whole decision.

The examples below show how sharp the exchange rate is. At 5 percent, $3,000 a month from $500,000 still leaves $123,219.14 after 20 years and lasts into year 24. At 3 percent, the same pot and the same withdrawal are gone 18 years in. Two percentage points of return moved the end of the plan by almost six years, and nothing about the spending changed.

Inflation pulls in the same direction. The withdrawal here is flat in cash terms, so what it buys shrinks a little every year. Keeping the buying power level means raising the withdrawal annually, which empties the pot sooner than this page shows. One way to see it in today's money is to enter a return net of inflation: the real return calculator works that figure out, and inflation and purchasing power explains the erosion. Running the same arithmetic in the other direction, filling a pot rather than spending one, is the savings goal calculator.

Worked examples

A \$500,000 pot at \$3,000 a month

You retire with $500,000 invested at 5 percent a year and take $3,000 out at the end of every month. What is left after 20 years?

  1. Find the monthly figures: n=20×12=240n = 20 \times 12 = 240, and i=0.05/12i = 0.05/12, which is 0.00416666 recurring rather than the 0.00416667 it usually gets printed as.
  2. Grow the pot as though you never touched it: 500000×(1+i)240=500000 \times (1 + i)^{240} = $1,356,320.14. Keep ii unrounded. Raising the rounded 0.00416667 to the 240th power instead adds about a dollar to this line, which is what 240 compoundings do to a rate rounded at the eighth decimal place.
  3. Grow the withdrawals the same way, because every dollar taken out stops earning from that month on: the 240 withdrawals come to $1,233,101.01 of future value.
  4. Subtract the second from the first. Both lines carry cents past the two shown, so the difference lands on $123,219.14; subtracting the two figures exactly as printed leaves it a cent short.

After 20 years the pot still holds $123,219.14. It would have grown to $1,356,320.14 untouched, and the withdrawals removed $1,233,101.01 of that. Even while paying you every month it earned $343,219.14 of growth. What is left is 41 months of withdrawals at that rate, but it keeps paying for another 45 of them and part of a 46th, because the balance goes on earning while you spend it.

What the withdrawals themselves cost

The withdrawals in the first example removed $1,233,101.01 from the pot, but you only received $3,000 a month. Where does the rest of that number come from?

  1. Count what actually reaches your bank account: 240 withdrawals of $3,000.
  2. Add them up: 3000×240=3000 \times 240 = $720,000.
  3. Now grow each one from the month it left the pot to the end of year 20, at the same 5 percent, and add those instead.

The cash you receive is $720,000. The cost to the pot is $1,233,101.01, because each withdrawal also stopped compounding the day it left. The gap between them, $513,101.01, is growth the pot never got the chance to make. The price of taking $3,000 out today is not $3,000: it is $3,000 plus everything that money would have earned between now and the end of the plan.

The same plan at a 3 percent return

Same $500,000, same $3,000 a month, but the pot averages 3 percent a year instead of 5. Where does that leave you after 17 years?

  1. The monthly rate falls to i=0.03/12=0.0025i = 0.03/12 = 0.0025, and n=17×12=204n = 17 \times 12 = 204.
  2. Grow the pot over those 204 months, grow the 204 withdrawals over the same months, and subtract as before.
  3. What is left is $35,037.83, which is fewer than 12 more withdrawals.

After 17 years the pot is down to $35,037.83 and it runs out 18 years in, to the month. The 5 percent version of the same plan still held $123,219.14 after 20 years and lasted into year 24. Two percentage points of return, with the pot and the withdrawal unchanged, moved the end of the plan by almost six years.

The mistake that costs the most

Reading one run of the calculator as the plan.

Every number on this page comes from a steady return applied month after month to a withdrawal that never changes. Both are simplifications, and they miss in the same direction, because a pot being spent from is more fragile than a smooth average makes it look.

Order is the reason. A poor stretch in the first years sells a bigger share of the pot to fund the same withdrawal, and those shares are gone before any recovery arrives. The identical stretch late in the plan does far less damage, because by then the withdrawals are coming out of a pot that already grew. Averages hide that entirely: the same average return, arriving in a different order, ends somewhere else.

So use it the way it is useful. Change one input at a time and watch how far the end of the plan moves. Dropping the return from 5 percent to 3 percent took nearly six years off, and a smaller withdrawal buys years back. A plan that only survives at one exact return is not a plan, it is a hope.

Common questions

What withdrawal rate is safe?

There is no single figure that is safe for everyone, and this page deliberately does not name one. The trade-off runs one way: a higher rate pays more now and raises the chance the money ends before you do, and a lower rate pays less now and leaves room to survive a poor decade. Widely quoted rules come from testing one market history over one length of retirement with one mix of assets, so they are planning rules rather than promises. This is educational material and not financial advice.

Does this account for inflation?

No. The withdrawal you enter stays flat in cash terms, so what it buys falls a little every year. Holding the buying power steady means raising the withdrawal each year, which empties the pot sooner than the figure here. A close approximation is to enter a return net of inflation rather than the headline return, which puts the whole answer in today's money. Net of inflation means divided, not subtracted: subtracting overstates what is left, and the real return calculator does the division.

Does tax change the answer?

Usually, but it turns entirely on which account the money sits in, and that is a rule of the country you file in rather than a rule of the arithmetic. In the United States, money coming out of a tax-deferred account is generally treated as income in the year you take it, so what you can spend is less than what you withdraw, and a withdrawal that has to fund a set amount of spending has to be the larger pre-tax figure. Accounts taxed on the way in instead, and the equivalent wrappers elsewhere, can pay out with nothing further owed, in which case no adjustment is needed at all. The treatment differs by account type and by country and changes over time, so check the current position for the accounts you actually hold. This is educational material and not tax advice.

Keep reading

This page is educational material, not financial advice. The figures come from the formula shown and assume the inputs you enter hold for the whole term. Your own rate, fees, taxes and timing will differ, so treat the output as arithmetic to check a decision against, not as a recommendation.