Skip to content

Leverage ratio formula and calculator

A leverage ratio compares what a business owes with what backs it. Three are in common use: debt-to-equity is debt/equity, debt-to-assets is debt/assets, and the equity multiplier is assets/equity. On $800,000 of assets and $500,000 of debt they read 1.67, 62.50 percent and 2.67. One balance sheet, three numbers.

Debt-to-equity ratio

1.67

$500,000 of debt against $300,000 of equity. A 10 percent fall in asset values would leave $220,000.

Debt to assets
62.50%
Equity multiplier
2.67
Equity: assets minus debt
$300,000
Equity after a 10% fall
$220,000
Fall in equity
26.67%
$

Everything the business owns, at book value.

$

Subtracted from assets to get the equity line, so use total liabilities for book equity.

%

A stress test. Debt is a fixed claim, so equity absorbs all of it.

The formula

D/E=DED/A=DAEM=AE\text{D/E} = \frac{D}{E} \qquad \text{D/A} = \frac{D}{A} \qquad \text{EM} = \frac{A}{E}

DD is total debt, EE is equity and AA is total assets. Equity is assets minus everything the company owes, so one balance sheet fixes all three at once. When the debt line is total liabilities, debt-to-equity plus 1 is the equity multiplier.

Which ratio the phrase leverage ratio means

Three different ratios go by that name, and they answer three different questions about the same balance sheet.

  • Debt-to-equity is debt divided by equity. It asks how much borrowed money stands behind each dollar of the owners' stake.
  • Debt-to-assets is debt divided by total assets. It asks what share of everything the business owns was paid for by borrowing, so for a solvent company it sits between 0 and 100 percent.
  • Equity multiplier is total assets divided by equity. It asks how many dollars of assets each dollar of equity is carrying.

These are not competing measures and they cannot disagree. Assets are liabilities plus equity by definition, so when the debt line is total liabilities any two of those figures fix all three ratios at once.

RatioFormulaOn $800,000 of assets and $500,000 of debt
Debt-to-equitydebt / equity1.67
Debt-to-assetsdebt / assets62.50 percent
Equity multiplierassets / equity2.67

A company quoted at 2.67 and a company quoted at 1.67 can be the same company described twice. That is why the ratio is worth naming in full every time it is quoted.

The three leverage ratio formulas

Start with the balance sheet identity, because each ratio is a rearrangement of it:

A=D+EA = D + E

Total assets equal total debt plus equity, with DD read as everything the company owes. Equity is the residual: what would be left for the owners if the assets fetched their book value and the debt was repaid. With $800,000 of assets and $500,000 of debt, equity is $300,000.

Debt-to-equity, debt over equity:

DE=500,000300,000=531.67\frac{D}{E} = \frac{500{,}000}{300{,}000} = \frac{5}{3} \approx 1.67

Debt-to-assets, debt over total assets, usually written as a percentage:

DA=500,000800,000=62.50%\frac{D}{A} = \frac{500{,}000}{800{,}000} = 62.50\%

The equity multiplier, total assets over equity:

AE=800,000300,000=832.67\frac{A}{E} = \frac{800{,}000}{300{,}000} = \frac{8}{3} \approx 2.67

Now the identity that ties the first to the third. Since A=D+EA = D + E:

AE=D+EE=DE+1\frac{A}{E} = \frac{D + E}{E} = \frac{D}{E} + 1

The equity multiplier is the debt-to-equity ratio plus one, exactly: 53+1=83\frac{5}{3} + 1 = \frac{8}{3}, which is 1.67 and 2.67 once both are rounded. That relation needs A=D+EA = D + E, so it needs the debt line to be everything the company owes. Given either number you already have the other, which settles most cases where two sources look like they disagree about a company.

What a fall in asset values does to equity

Debt is a fixed claim. The balance and the payment schedule are set by contract, and neither shrinks because the assets behind them lost value. So the whole of that loss comes out of equity, and the equity multiplier measures exactly how much:

equity fall=asset fall×AE\text{equity fall} = \text{asset fall} \times \frac{A}{E}

On the balance sheet above the multiplier is 2.67, so a 10 percent fall in asset values is a 26.67 percent fall in equity. Equity was only $300,000 of the $800,000 to begin with, it absorbs the entire loss, and it ends at $220,000.

The arithmetic runs the same way upward: a 10 percent rise in asset values lifts equity by 26.67 percent. That is what financial leverage is. It multiplies the move in both directions, and the multiplier is a number you can read off the balance sheet before anything happens.

The second and third worked examples below put the same 10 percent fall through two companies with identical assets and different debt. The one carrying less leverage loses exactly half as much of its equity, because its equity multiplier is exactly half the size.

What counts as debt, and what counts as high

Two definitional choices change the answer before any arithmetic starts.

What goes on the debt line. Some analysts use total liabilities, which sweeps in payables, accruals, pension obligations and leases. Others count interest-bearing debt only: loans, bonds and lease liabilities. Total liabilities always produces the higher ratio, and net debt, which subtracts cash, produces the lowest. The equity multiplier does not move at all, because assets over equity never touches the debt line, and that is exactly why debt-to-equity plus one only returns the multiplier when the debt line is total liabilities. None of the three is wrong on its own. Comparing a company measured one way against a company measured another way is.

What equity means. These ratios use book equity from the balance sheet, not market value. Book equity can be small, or negative, at a company the stock market prices highly, which is why a debt-to-equity ratio sometimes lurches for reasons that have nothing to do with new borrowing.

There is no universal threshold for a high leverage ratio. A regulated utility with predictable cash flows commonly runs debt-to-equity near or above 1.0, and a software company with few physical assets often runs close to zero. What compares across industries is the direction of travel and whether the cash flow covers the interest, not the level itself.

Banking uses the phrase for something different again. A bank's leverage ratio is Tier 1 capital divided by total exposure, so there a higher number means a safer bank, the opposite direction from every ratio on this page. The Basel minimum is 3 percent, with a buffer on top of that for global systemically important banks and a higher floor in some jurisdictions.

The household version of the same question is the debt-to-income calculator, which measures payments against income rather than balances against assets. On the operating side, fixed costs behave like debt: they do not fall when sales do, so they multiply the effect of a change in volume on profit, which is what the break-even calculator shows.

Worked examples

All three ratios from one balance sheet

A company holds $800,000 of assets and owes $500,000 of debt. What are its debt-to-equity ratio, its debt-to-assets ratio and its equity multiplier?

  1. Find equity first, because two of the three need it: 800,000500,000=300,000800{,}000 - 500{,}000 = 300{,}000, so equity is $300,000.
  2. Debt-to-equity is debt over equity: 500,000/300,0001.67500{,}000 / 300{,}000 \approx 1.67. Each dollar of equity carries about 1.67 dollars of debt.
  3. Debt-to-assets is debt over total assets: 500,000/800,000=0.625500{,}000 / 800{,}000 = 0.625, which is 62.50 percent of the assets funded by borrowing.
  4. The equity multiplier is total assets over equity: 800,000/300,0002.67800{,}000 / 300{,}000 \approx 2.67. Each dollar of equity is carrying about 2.67 dollars of assets.
  5. Check the identity: 1.67+1=2.671.67 + 1 = 2.67. Debt-to-equity plus one is the equity multiplier whenever the debt line is everything the company owes, which is the case here.

Debt-to-equity is 1.67, debt-to-assets is 62.50 percent and the equity multiplier is 2.67. Those are three readings of one $800,000 balance sheet, not three companies. Nothing has been stressed yet: that is the position as it stands, before the 10 percent fall in asset values the next example applies to it.

A 10 percent fall in asset values

The same company, the same $800,000 of assets and $500,000 of debt. Asset values fall 10 percent and the debt does not move. What happens to equity?

  1. Take 10 percent off the assets: 800,000×0.90=720,000800{,}000 \times 0.90 = 720{,}000.
  2. Debt is a fixed claim, so it stays at $500,000 whatever the assets do.
  3. Equity is the residual, so it takes the entire hit: 720,000500,000=220,000720{,}000 - 500{,}000 = 220{,}000, which is $220,000.
  4. Measure the fall against the $300,000 equity started at: (300,000220,000)/300,0000.2667(300{,}000 - 220{,}000) / 300{,}000 \approx 0.2667, so 26.67 percent.
  5. The equity multiplier said so in advance. It is 2.67, or exactly 8/3, and the fall in assets times that multiplier is the fall in equity: 10 percent becomes 26.67 percent.

Equity falls from $300,000 to $220,000, a drop of 26.67 percent, on a 10 percent fall in asset values. The equity multiplier of 2.67 is the size of that amplification. It is the same number in good periods, when a 10 percent rise in asset values would lift equity by 26.67 percent instead.

The same shock on a balance sheet with less leverage

Same $800,000 of assets and the same 10 percent fall, but this company owes $200,000 rather than $500,000. How much of its equity does the shock take?

  1. Equity is bigger to start with: 800,000200,000=600,000800{,}000 - 200{,}000 = 600{,}000, so $600,000.
  2. The three ratios: 200,000/600,0000.33200{,}000 / 600{,}000 \approx 0.33 for debt-to-equity, 200,000/800,000=0.25200{,}000 / 800{,}000 = 0.25 or 25 percent for debt-to-assets, and 800,000/600,0001.33800{,}000 / 600{,}000 \approx 1.33 for the equity multiplier.
  3. Apply the same fall: assets go to 800,000×0.90=720,000800{,}000 \times 0.90 = 720{,}000, and equity to 720,000200,000=520,000720{,}000 - 200{,}000 = 520{,}000, which is $520,000.
  4. The fall in equity is (600,000520,000)/600,0000.1333(600{,}000 - 520{,}000) / 600{,}000 \approx 0.1333, so 13.33 percent, which is the 10 percent asset fall multiplied by the 1.33 equity multiplier.

Equity falls from $600,000 to $520,000, which is 13.33 percent, against 26.67 percent at the company that owed more. Identical assets and an identical shock, and exactly half the share of the equity gone, because this equity multiplier is 4/3 where the other company's is 8/3, printed to two decimals as 1.33 and 2.67.

The mistake that costs the most

Quoting a leverage ratio without saying which one it is.

The company in the first worked example is a 1.67, a 62.50 percent and a 2.67 at the same instant, and all three are correct. Put its 2.67 in a table beside another company's 1.67 and you have manufactured a gap that does not exist. This is not a rounding difference or a matter of judgement, it is two formulas sharing one name.

Two habits fix it. Write the ratio with its formula attached, as debt/equity or as assets/equity, never as a bare leverage ratio. Then use the identity to test a pair of figures from different sources: on a debt line of total liabilities, debt-to-equity plus one is the equity multiplier, so a source saying 1.67 and a source saying 2.67 about one balance sheet are agreeing. If the gap between two such figures is anything other than exactly one, at least one of them is not measuring debt as total liabilities, and that has to be settled before the comparison means anything.

Common questions

Which leverage ratio should I use?

Match it to the question. Debt-to-equity for how the balance sheet is funded, and it is the one most often meant when the phrase is used bare. Debt-to-assets when you want a share of the total that cannot exceed 100 percent at a solvent company. The equity multiplier when you want to know how far a move in asset values is amplified before it reaches the owners. All three come off one balance sheet, and on a total liabilities debt line any one of them gives you the other two, so the choice is about which is easiest to read, not about which is right.

Does debt mean total liabilities or only borrowings?

Both definitions are in use and they give different numbers. Total liabilities includes payables, accruals and lease obligations. Interest-bearing debt counts loans, bonds and lease liabilities only. Total liabilities always gives the higher ratio, and net debt, which nets off cash, gives the lowest. Pick one, use it for every company in the comparison, and say which one you used.

Is a higher leverage ratio always worse?

No. Debt is cheaper than equity and its interest is usually deductible, so some borrowing raises the return on equity in good periods. What rises with the ratio is fragility. At an equity multiplier of 2.67 a 37.5 percent fall in asset values wipes equity out, because 37.5 percent of the assets was all the equity there was. At a multiplier of 1.33 it takes a 75 percent fall, because there the equity was 75 percent of the assets. The level that suits a business depends on how predictable its cash flows are and how soon the debt has to be repaid.

Keep reading

This page is educational material, not financial advice. The figures come from the formula shown and assume the inputs you enter hold for the whole term. Your own rate, fees, taxes and timing will differ, so treat the output as arithmetic to check a decision against, not as a recommendation.